The
Dirtiest Job
Posted
on: April 23, 2014
by Don Heres:
The Water Looks OK. Are You Willing To Stake Your Life On It?
Today’s op however, is
the type of call every responder dreads. Seven days ago, the five year old son
of a prominent citizen disappeared while riding his bike around the
neighborhood. Until today, there had been no clues as to his whereabouts. Early
this morning, a golfer found a small shoe on the bank of the water hazard on
the number 6 hole at the exclusive Bushwood Country Club. The shoe was similar
to the type the missing boy was wearing on the day he disappeared.
Driving through the
entrance of the finely manicured front gate, you are taken aback by the scenic
beauty of this place. Today it is definitely above your pay grade, but thirty
years ago it was rolling farmland where you hunted and rode your minibike.
These manicured fairways and immaculate greens are a far cry from the corn and
potatoes that were once grown here. Even the old farm ponds have been turned
into scenic works of landscape art. Gently rolling fairways, perfect greens,
blooming azaleas and the new green foliage on the trees complete a visual
spectacle that makes golf courses in the spring something to behold, definitely
a playground for the rich and famous.
Upon pulling into the
parking lot you are met by a Who’s Who of local dignitaries, each with a look
on their face that ranges from concern to angry impatience. The county manager,
the sheriff, the fire chief, the mayor and several council members are there to
brief, complain, and question your plan. Terrified family members gather around
each other and watch in disbelief as you drive by. The local news channel’s van
is parked in the main lot. It has its satellite dish aimed skyward and Danica
Pomeroy, that cute reporter, is primping in its side mirror getting ready for a
live feed as you drive by. As if the pressure being exerted by county officials
was not enough, you cannot help but notice the 30 or so golfers all standing by
the clubhouse looking impatiently at their watches as their appointed tee times
have come and gone. You somehow did not expect this kind of pressure as you
departed the station. To add to the surreal nature of being at Bushwood, you
are practically assaulted by the course marshal and greens keeper when you tell
them you will have to drive the equipment truck to the dive location. You are
again accosted with the “hurry up, but don’t damage the course” attitude.
Upon arrival at the
dive location you are pressed to make decisions quickly under the penetrating
gaze of the county manager and the other officials who have followed you there
in a parade of golf carts. They all know the missing child’s family, and each
has surely received phone calls reminding them of that fact. You quickly decide
that this is a simple search dive, probably more for show than anything else.
Hopefully, you can get in and out quickly, without finding anything. It makes
no sense that that the missing child would be in this location. It is well away
from roads and several miles from his house. By donning wetsuits and simple
open-circuit SCUBA gear, you can get divers into the water quickly and appease
the impatient onlookers. These old ponds are usually 10-12 feet deep with
sediment bottoms, so it will be a quick, easy search, even though recent spring
rains have you a little concerned about visibility. Using two experienced
divers and two tenders to assist, they quickly don their equipment and enter
the water.
Within minutes, a
surface marker appears in the middle of the pond. A muddy cloud also appears at
the surface. Knowing this is not good, you ask law enforcement officers to
clear the area and to secure the perimeter. EMS is called forward and tarps are
brought out to mask what will probably unfold shortly.
Underwater, your
divers have discovered the decomposing body of a young male, wrapped with heavy
chains around him and his bicycle, resting on the bottom. Excited and fueled by
a combination of semi-panic, adrenaline and the urgency to hurry that often
follows the discovery of something ghastly, the divers drop to their knees and
begin to try and dislodge the combined mass from the mud. Without
communications gear, and feeling hard-pressed to recover the body quickly, the
divers decide to remain submerged and press on. By using a small lift bag, they
reason, they can lift the entire mass as a single package, thus maintaining the
integrity of the grisly evidence. Getting the lift bag straps under the
collection of metal and human remains requires digging a trench through the
sediment with their hands. Visibility drops as the sediment cloud envelops the
two divers. With no real current in the pond, the cloud seems to linger like a
morning fog before eventually falling back to the bottom.
Divers, dressed in ordinary SCUBA equipment
bring a body to the shoreline. Photo courtesy of documentingreality.com
The yellow lift bag
breaks the surface along with the divers accompanying it. The body is moved
towards shore, and EMS and law enforcement take custody and begin their
processing procedure. Realizing the two divers have been exposed to the
biological hazards of a decomposing body, you expedite their exit from the
water and begin washing them with fresh water from a nearby yard hydrant.
Tenders mix a 5% solution of sodium hypochlorite and water and begin scrubbing
all of the outer surfaces of their dive equipment in an attempt to kill any biological
residue. The divers use soap on their skin and hair after removing their
wetsuits. With the pressure off, another dive team, dressed in drysuits,
full-faced masks and communications gear enter the pond to continue searching
for evidence.
As your team prepares
to depart, you are offered congratulations and compliments by the County
officials who have been watching the operation. They felt your professionalism
and rapid deployment helped bring a delicate situation to an end. After
cleaning the equipment that was used, your team members disperse with many,
like yourself, heading towards home and dinner. While relaxing, the events of
the day run through your mind. Although rushed you feel you were able to lead a
successful operation and bring closure to a grieving family.
As you start to walk
up the stairs toward your bedroom, the phone rings. On the other end you hear
crying, and the wife of one of your first-in divers tells you that her husband
is in the Emergency Room after collapsing and going into convulsions right
after dinner. As you drive towards the hospital, the questions start rolling
through your head. What happened? Was it related to today’s dive operation?
What did I miss?
As a training
exercise, stop here and take out a piece of paper. Evaluate the preceding
scenario listing all of the errors made during the operation, but most
importantly list the root cause of each mistake. Mistakes in operational
protocols are usually relatively easy to pick out for experienced dive team
members; however, determining the root cause of errors sometimes takes a more
detailed evaluation. It is imperative that anyone operating in “contaminated
water” be able to see beyond the obvious. By not only evaluating what was done
wrong, but also why it was done wrong, you as a team leader have the ability to
be “pro-active” rather than simply taking “reactive” corrective actions.
First and foremost,
this is a “contaminated water” dive. “Contaminated water” is simply what the
term “Bad stuff” or “MEBS” (Methyl Ethyl Bad Stuff) was to HAZMAT teams before
the implementation of CFR 1910.120 (HAZWOPER) in 1986. Like the term or not…
this is a HAZMAT dive. It is no different than when a member of a Hazardous
Materials Response Team dons a fully encapsulated Level A chemical suit to
enter a hostile environment. It is time that divers recognize truly just what
“contaminated water” really is, and the implications it may have on PSD’s.
Simply camouflaging the term “HAZMAT” with catchy buzz words does not degrade
or lessen the dangers of chemicals that may be present. Some of the potential
HAZMAT problems are obvious, other are not.
While the team’s lack
of practical training is obvious and plays a major role, let’s by-pass this for
a moment and look at what is perhaps the biggest factor that contributed to the
eventual negative outcome… pressure. From the outset, the dive team leader
(DTL) was being pushed and pressured to hurry. The prominence of the missing
child, the number of high ranking officials on-scene, the media, the presence
of distraught family members, even the impatient golfers all contribute to the
pressure the DTL was feeling to expedite the operation. This pressure also
trickled down to the initial dive team as even they felt the need to hurry.
This external pressure can, and did, force decisions without proper evaluation
or size-up.
The point here is that
you cannot be rushed… period. To the untrained observer, or “operationally
ignorant”, it may appear that things are moving slowly for no reason. This lack
of knowledge by observers is often expressed in the form of anger or
impatience. It is not uncommon to hear things such as, “What are you waiting
for?” or “Hurry up and just jump in the water, what’s so difficult about that?”
It is up to the DTL to evaluate the scene and insure the safety of all
personnel, not appease the crowd. Establish an operational dive plan and stick
to your SOG’s. Under no circumstances should the priorities of others be
allowed to compromise safety.
Another root cause of
the negative outcome could very easily be contributed to complacency. In this
case, the tranquil and scenic surroundings did not look like a crime scene. It
apparently did not fit into the crime scene image visualized by the DTL. In
this case his preconceived ideas immediately led him to believe this was
probably a false alarm and that they would find nothing during their search.
Complacency is a deadly trap and must be avoided. As any CSI will tell you,
there is no such thing as a typical crime scene. Any dive, especially where the
primary objective is looking for a body, must be treated as if a body will be
found. Additionally, ponds, lakes and streams are likely to have a variety of
wildlife decomposing on the bottom. Even a diver, changing the zinc anodes on
the fishing trawler at the dock behind the local coastal seafood market will
encounter fish carcasses rotting on the bottom. All of these biologicals pose a
potential health threat that cannot be ignored.
Next let’s consider
the team’s apparent lack of Standard Operating Guidelines. Guidance documents
are critical to insure safety. These documents are developed, reviewed, and
modified to address how a team will operate during a variety of situations.
During early planning and strategy meetings, dive team members have the
opportunity to evaluate the type of diving they are trained, equipped, and
willing to do. Once these boundaries are established, procedural guidelines are
put into place to provide a step-by-step roadmap that leads to a safe
conclusion. They should be flexible enough to adapt to any situation, but rigid
enough to insure that safety is neither by-passed nor compromised.
“Contaminated water” diving is nothing new. The U.S. Navy, the EPA diving program,
and PSD teams across the country have already established SOG’s that embrace
entering contaminated water. Books, such as ERDI’s Contaminated Water Diving
Operations by Michael Glenn, research and information published
by Viking and DUI, have introduced divers to the dangers of “dirty water”. In
the scenario above, it is apparent that SOG’s have neither been developed nor
followed. The decision to use open-circuit SCUBA appeared almost to be
off-the-cuff, because it was simple and fast. Diver safety and evidence
recovery were compromised. If contaminated water SOG’s had been in place, no
diver would have entered the water without appropriate protection from
biological hazards… at a minimum.
In your opinion, was a
comprehensive size-up and scene evaluation conducted? It is imperative that a
complete and thorough evaluation of the dive location be conducted before any
dive operations begin. A dive operations plan will pivot around this
evaluation. The initial size-up conducted by the DTL was better suited for Golf
Digest than a dive operation. Even the DTL’s own memories of the
location provided valuable clues as to the potential dangers associated with
the location, but were quickly discarded. He remembered the location as
farmland where potatoes and corn grew. Both of these crops relied heavily on
DDT-based pesticides to control insects. Even though DDT was banned in the
1970’s, it is a very persistent chemical that leeches into soil and sediment.
Years of use would cause the pesticides to run into farm ponds and settle into
the sediment at the bottom. These farm ponds would later become water hazards
at Bushwood. As if ancient pesticides were not bad enough, golf courses do not
just magically become landscape marvels. They require amazing amounts of
fertilizer, herbicides, pesticides, and other chemicals being applied year
round.
Of the 30 most commonly used turf pesticides, 19 can cause cancer, 13
are linked to birth defects, 21 can affect reproduction and 15 are nervous
system toxicants. Studies are even being conducted to determine the health
effects of these chemicals on golfers. Warnings have been issued for golfers to
wear long pants and long socks when playing to prevent contact with these
chemicals. The most popular and widely used lawn chemical, 2,4-D, which kills
broad leaf weeds like dandelions, is an endocrine disruptor with predicted
human health hazards ranging from changes in estrogen and testosterone levels
to thyroid problems, prostate cancer, and reproductive abnormalities. 2,4-D has
also been linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. With the “recent spring rains”
(i.e. the “first flush”), these chemicals wash into the same water hazards and
also accumulate in the sediment, the same sediment the first dive team was
aggressively working in. The same sediment that enveloped the divers in a dirty
cloud while on the bottom. The same divers who entered the water wearing, what amounts
to, recreational SCUBA equipment and worked feverishly in the cloud of hanging
sediment. While biological hazards were indeed a problem, it appears that
hazardous chemical problems were never even considered. Nothing can pose a
threat to divers more than an inadequate scene size-up. Failure to carefully
evaluate the scene leads to missed clues. Sometimes these clues are obvious,
but a lack of training and knowledge can make them invisible. Only by training
DTL’s, as well as team members, to properly conduct a size-up that extends
beyond dive parameters, can we minimize the likelihood of a diver suffering a
chemical related injury.
Most of you have
probably already concluded that this particular team was inadequately trained
to be conducting the operations in which they were engaging. Not only is
inadequate training a serious root problem, it appears that a lack of knowledge
about the type of training necessary may also be contributory. Diving,
especially PSD diving is not diver friendly. Forget the beautiful, crystal
clear open waters of the Bahamas. In public safety diving, visibility and
mobility would be considered a luxury, as farm ponds and hog lagoons seldom
offer either. PSD diving is always in the wrong place and at the wrong time.
Why else would you be there? Simply acquiring diving equipment and recruiting
experienced open water divers does not make for a successful dive team. In
fact, it probably does just the opposite. Most open water divers complain when
visibility drops to 10-15 feet. Operating in zero visibility creates a whole
new set of problems for inexperienced “toilet water” divers. Fear and panic are
the most common. Many problems will render a team operationally ineffective.
Any team that begins operations without mastering the multitude of training
required to operate in an overtly hostile environment is asking for problems
such as the one described.
Today’s firefighters are being required to obtain
Firefighter I & II Certification through standardized agencies such as
International Fire Service Accreditation Congress (IFSAC). This requires
firefighters to master a variety of skill and knowledge challenges before they
begin responding to actual emergencies. Additionally, they must attain HAZMAT
Operations Level Certification to be prepared for the fact that they will
inevitably encounter dangerous materials. The above scenario presents the case
for establishing a mandatory certification program that guides public sector
dive teams. Technical dive training that insures the proper use of drysuits,
full face masks, and surface supplied air are obvious. Contaminated water
training should also be mandatory, just as HAZMAT is for firefighters. Again,
whether you like the term or not, contaminated water is HAZMAT. Unlike diving
in the open ocean, there are very few inland water bodies that do not hold the
potential of serious contamination. Any dive, no matter what the objective,
should be treated as if there are contaminants in the water. Home and farm
chemicals wind up in streams, lakes and ponds. Rivers, such as the Hudson in
NY, may be contaminated with PCB’s or a variety of TIC’s (Toxic Industrial
Chemicals).
1952 – The heavily polluted Cuyahoga River
burns doing over one million dollars in damage to boats and riverfront buildings.
Photo courtesy of NOAA.
The Cuyahoga River in
Ohio is so polluted that in 1969 it actually caught fire… for the 13th time.
Transportation accidents can introduce innumerable chemicals into the water.
Operating in these contaminated waters not only poses a risk to the diver, but
also to tenders and support staff that may assist divers as they exit the
water, which means team training needs to extend beyond just protecting the
divers. Training that prepares DTL’s to better assess the hazards of a dive
location are needed. Dive team members have to be trained in such a way that
they can recognize hazardous water environments and insure their own safety.
OSHA’s CFR 1910.120, the Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
Standard applies to “employees” who operate in chemical environments or respond
to situations where hazardous chemicals may be present. The EPA’s 40 CFR 311
mirrors the same mandatory requirements as put forth in OSHA’s HAZWOPER.
Responders as a whole often shy away (better stated as RUN away) from HAZMAT
training as misconceptions usually lead responders to believe it will be a
detailed study of chemistry, physics, and math. It is not. While HAZMAT is
obviously rooted in the advanced sciences, it is more of an acquisition of
knowledge and the application of common sense. We live in a petro-chemical
society, chemicals are everywhere. Simply put… chemicals are not going away, so
we as divers need to accept this and “improvise, adapt, and overcome” to move
forward, continue doing our jobs, and return home safely every night
The ERDI course, Contaminated
Water Diving Operations, is an excellent first step towards recognizing the
dangers associated with diving in “dirty water” and gaining a necessary
competence in the subject matter. The objective of the program is to help
divers establish recognition and planning methods for contaminated water
diving.
Don Heres was
certified in 1977 and after graduation from NCSU he worked for 6 years doing
commercial diving and ship husbandry along the east coast. He has spent 30
years as a Firefighter, Officer, and Fire Service Instructor, retiring from
active response as an Assistant Chief. He served as the Lead HAZMAT Instructor
for the NC Office of the State Fire Marshal where he developed the original
Hazardous Materials Responder Certification and HAZMAT Instructor Qualification
programs for North Carolina and served on the Governor’s Committee that
developed the NC’s HAZMAT Regional Response Teams. He also served as the Hazardous
Materials Coordinator for Wake County Emergency Management where he was
responsible for HAZMAT planning and SARA Title III Programs. Today he continues
to teach Firefighters and owns Hazard-Risk Management Associates in
Clayton, NC a company that specializes in OSHA Safety and training hazardous
materials responders in both the public and private sectors. He continues to be
an avid diver.
This
entry was posted in ERDI News.
No comments:
Post a Comment